Showing posts with label road movie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label road movie. Show all posts

There's Always One- MONSTERS Review

Remember how District 9 dazzled everybody last year to become the sleeper hit of the year? I also remember how inevitable it seemed that a weaker copycat film would shortly manifest itself. Monsters is not that film, despite what the deceptively similar marketing techniques might have you believe. Aside from not erring too close to Neill Blomkamp's film in content though, it's also not really anywhere near as good.

Writer-director Gareth Edwards paints the America of Monsters as a post-Cloverfield continent. Alien encounters have become a routine occurrence, six years after the destruction of a space probe brought tonnes of alien spores down to Earth in Central America. This led to everything in between the USA and Mexico being cordoned off as an infected zone, through which photojournalist Andrew must escort his boss' daughter Samantha.

Despite the pains I have to go to to make a blurb about the world, the plot is far more about the last part of that synopsis than about the world it's set in. It's never usually a problem when a filmmaker focuses on character development and story over bombast and spectacle, but the problem here is that the characters and story are not that arresting. Because the crew was so small, many of the supporting actors are people that they met along the way and persuaded to be in the film. So while Edwards gets the writing credit for coming up with the step outline, much of the film is ad-libbed whenever the extras are involved. The story of the film's production is more engaging than the film itself.


I don't know about anyone else, but I generally hold that when it comes to film, it's better to find truth in a construction, than to try and construct truth and fail. That's why, in terms of comedy, for example, something as wildly over the top as I Love You Phillip Morris seems more human to me than mumblecore output like Cyrus or Greenberg. Edwards' sketchy approach means that the bystanders come across as even more strained, rather than naturalistic. Real life couple Scoot McNairy and Whitney Able are fair enough as Andrew and Samantha, but I never really invested in their characters like I was supposed to. Simply put, they're not that interesting, and it's a real shame that the film uses the world's acceptance of aliens as a licence to show no interest in the world either.

Surely the most notable thing about the film is its budget, and the professional look it has, for that budget. Edwards created all of the special effects shots himself in post-production, using consumer level software like Autodesk 3ds Max. The film itself was shot guerilla-style on location, with a tiny crew and not so much as a camera dolly to work with. The production budget came to just over half a million, apparently, and for that, I have to say that it's a very handsome film. The special effects are extremely well integrated and make even the Cthulhu-like monsters of the title look realistic. The trouble is that the film is focused instead on the relationship drama, which doesn't hold up because the characters aren't that likeable.

Edwards says he was aiming for “War of the Worlds meets Lost In Translation”, and that's at least a sharp relief from the usual alien invasion movie tropes. By taking the decision to stick with these characters, we do get some consummately executed moments. The closest thing the film has to an action scene is viewed from inside the jeep where Andrew and Samantha are hiding. We don't get lascivious shots of how great the CG monsters look in that scene, but we're instead confined to a vehicle, with our leads, in a scene that's reminiscent of Jurassic Park, another Spielberg film.

The film itself is never as interesting as the idea though, nor is it as interesting as its own special effects. The praise for the film, as far as I can see, is coming from one very specific place- the place that wants independent films to take on Hollywood at their own game with a fraction of its budget. Where District 9 and Kick-Ass have succeeded in the past year by being produced outside of the studio system and for a fraction of say, Avatar's budget, those were both great movies with great performances and a great script, irrespective of budget.  

Monsters is really more of an achievement in visuals, for its relatively low budget. It's less of an achievement in entertainment or storytelling, and when I was led to expect a masterpiece by everyone and their mums, I don't feel the result is that memorable. I do hope that Monsters does well in cinemas all the same, because as disappointing as it was, it's still a cut above most of the other stuff now playing in multiplexes. It's not District 9, no matter how desperately the distributors want it to be, but it is a captivating albeit frustrating piece. Edwards comes close enough to getting it right this time that I'm looking forward to whatever he does next.

Monsters is now showing at cinemas nationwide.
------------------------------------------------------------------
If you've seen Monsters, why not share your comments below? If you need any more persuasion that Vertigo Films are dying to make this into the new District 9, look no further than the title. In the actual film, the aliens are always referred to as "creatures" and their lack of screen time makes that title equivalent to calling Unstoppable "Peace and Quiet".

I'm Mark the mad prophet, and until next time, don't watch anything I wouldn't watch.

Plain Trains and Automobiles- DUE DATE Review

At what point does something shift from being a loving homage or a "thematic remake" to being an all-out rip-off? The answer is probably to be found somewhere to be found between the greenlighting of Due Date and its arrival in cinemas this week. In almost every respect, I preferred it when it was called Planes, Trains and Automobiles.

A hectored businessman is travelling home and ends up stuck with a loveable buffoon who gets him in and out of all kinds of scrapes. The basic skeleton is the same, and there's not a lot of meat on the bones- the businessman is Peter Highman, whose wife is giving birth to their first child at the end of the week. An altercation with Ethan Tremblay, the buffoon, gets him on the no-fly list, and the two of them cross America together before the arrival of Peter's first-born.

Todd Phillips is clearly on top of the pile at the moment, what with his uber-successful comedy The Hangover becoming one of the big sleeper hits of 2009 and working its way into the affections of a million Facebook users who like to start arbitrary groups with names like "Doug's in the trunk, LOL JK, it's a naked Asian guy with a stick". When you make that film, you're allowed to make whatever you want to make next, within reason.

Phillips resolved to go backwards, not only by making a film closer to his Road Trip or Old School than to The Hangover, but also by plagiarising from a much better John Hughes film. I don't want every film to cite its influences as blatantly as Easy A professed its roots in the Hughes canon, but this film doesn't have a high enough IQ for me to believe Phillips knew he was ripping off Planes, Trains and Automobiles. If he did, that just makes it even worse, because the only clear benefit of his perspective on the story comes in the form of pot jokes and a masturbating dog.

The story beats are almost exactly the same too. Peter gets beat up when he loses his cool with someone, a rental car is destroyed, Peter considers abandoning Ethan- all things that happened before, and happened with more humour and warmth, to Neal Page and Del Griffith back in 1987. That film was tender in the way that the very best of John Hughes' work is funny and tender. Due Date is a lot more callous, appealing to the lowest common denominator.

Robert Downey Jr. steps in for Steve Martin, and astoundingly, the film manages to make him unlikeable. After a dazzling run of great roles from 2005's Kiss Kiss Bang Bang up until now, this film really made me dislike Robert Downey Jr. Do we give a shit if he gets home on time? No, because the only urgency about his character's odyssey is supposed to come from Michelle Monaghan, who literally phones in her peformance as the expectant mother of Peter's child. Some sympathy with Peter is sorely needed and sadly absent, when you consider what he's contrasted with.

Fresh off of The Hangover, Zach Galifianakis is another man-child as Ethan. In John Candy's performance as Del, there was a real human being visible. He has that absolutely wonderful monologue where he retorts to a blistering rant by Steve Martin by saying he's happy in himself, and that he has loved ones who like him for who he is too. It's a sober moment that a cartoon character like Galifianakis would never get, and I really don't think he has the range to pull off something like that. Instead, Ethan is calculated to annoy the shit out of Peter, and I dare say the audience as well, and act without any recognisable indication of human behaviour.

It all rings false, and although it's not without its moments, it's all very meticulously pitched towards being a hit of the exact same type as The Hangover. Galifianakis actually says "LOL JK" at one point for that very purpose, but even with the spontaneous group-making tendencies of its target audience, I can't see there being many groups called "The Pilgrims Built The Grand Canyon" or "I Hate It When I'm Smoking Weed For My Glaucoma And I Get Arrested" or "I Gut-Punched A Six Year Old LOL". Well, maybe that will happen, but for all of the moments I just said the film has, I'll be damned if I can remember many of them.

Due Date is a waste, really. It's Todd Phillips' failure to realise that the success of The Hangover happened by circumstance and not by design. Indeed, given how most of his movies are road movies, I'm surprised at how long its taken him to make a film that takes off Planes, Trains and Automobiles so blatantly. And pitched as it is for the generation who loves The Hangover, it really pales in comparison. Too many plot turns ring false and too many jokes fall flat. My hopes are suitably lowered for next summer's The Hangover Part II.

Due Date is now showing in cinemas nationwide.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------
If you've seen Due Date, why not share your comments below? Can you believe Jamie Foxx is in this movie? Whatever happened to the Oscar-winning actor whose name used to mean something in cinema? Eesh.

I'm Mark the mad prophet, and until next time, don't watch anything I wouldn't watch.

Kategori

Kategori